|Page 5 of 6|
of Operation of a Death Squad in San Pedro la Laguna
[ Introduction ]
|On the day the tortured bodies of Lencho and
Pedro were found in Xequistel, townsmen notified the press as well as the army. On Friday,
March 1, 1985, a detailed story, with pictures, on the double murder in San Pedro appeared
in the Prensa Libre under a six-column streamer: "Commotion over Crimes."
The account stated that, according to his widow, Lencho recognized one of his captors and
said, "Good evening, my lieutenant." It also named the suspected alguacil, stating
that he had confessed that he was one of the accomplices and that a lieutenant was
another. The full name of the lieutenant had been given to the army, according to the
article, but the newspaper did not print his name.
On March 2, the Prensa Libre, under a six-column heading, "Army Opens Investigation," quoted a colonel in charge of public relations for the nation's armed forces as saying that there was no army official in San Pedro but that, nevertheless, in view of the seriousness of the information appearing in the press, an investigation had been ordered to establish the truth of the claims. The colonel assured readers that the army would never retain in its ranks persons who acted illegally and that any officer accused of a crime, with evidence, would be turned over to the proper tribunal for judgment.
|On March 3, under a six-column banner,
"Calm Returns to San Pedro la Laguna," the Prensa Libre reported that the
colonel in command of Military Zone 14 (Sololá) had spent a few hours in San Pedro
talking with municipal officials and Lencho's widow and concluded that certain unnamed
parties had coerced the widow to claim that an army lieutenant had been involved.
According to the newspaper article, the commander said that the widow herself had
disavowed the claim and that the stories of the army's participation in the crime were
therefore totally discredited. He also said, according to the article, that the Pedranos
informed him that they blamed the kidnapping and assassination of the commissioner and his
uncle on a group of guerrillas known as lxchil (lxim) who previously were military
commissioners. The commander assured the Pedranos, the paper reported, that the army would
stay watchful to see that the forces of "subversive delinquency" did not
continue to use the Pedranos as instruments for casting blame on the armed forces, whose
only mission, he said, was to ensure "peace, tranquillity, and harmony."
The next day, another article appeared in the Prensa Libre under the headline "Army Affirms No Lieutenant Involved in San Pedro's Crimes." The story, based on a communique issued by the army's department of public relations, asserted that a subversive group self-styled Ixim had committed the crimes, that the perpetrators had been captured, and that they had induced Lencho's widow to make a false accusation.
The army's reconstruction of the events departs from the Pedranos' version. The story Lencho's widow tells is the same one she told reporters at the outset. She claimed from the first and she continues to claim that her husband recognized the lieutenant and greeted him by name. She does not recall ever being interviewed by the military zonal commander, as reported in the newspaper. According to knowledgeable sources, the lieutenant named by Lencho was quietly transferred from Sololá to a military prison in Guatemala City to await trial in a military court for kidnapping and murder. These same sources had persuasive evidence, they said, that the lieutenant had been paid seven hundred dollars to kill Lencho and his uncle and that they knew who had delivered the money.
The payment had allegedly been delivered by one of the five Pedranos who had recently been exposed as confidenciales (secret agents) working for army intelligence (G-2). The five were among the fifteen suspects rounded up after Lencho and Pedro were murdered. The other ten were virtually the same as the ten suspects described in the April 12, 1983, newspaper article as "still going about freely as though they hadn't done a thing."
Two of the secret agents had also doubled as military commissioners during San Pedro's two-year noche negra. One was the man seen in the yellow pickup that drove Pedro away from the Panajachel dock. He was also one of the two commissioners who took a third commissioner for a fatal walk along the beach in San Pedro in August 1982. The other military commissioner who doubled as a secret agent was Salvador, who became acting chief after Commissioner Jacinto was arrested but whose bid to become formal chief was vigorously opposed by the community. The three other individuals revealed to be secret agents were the boat owner, the deposed mayor Jorge, and the güizache Mario.
It is interesting and ironic to recall that three of the secret agents Salvador, Jorge, and Mariohad tried to silence Fernando, the shrillest of the whistle blowers, by accusing him of calumny at the hearing held by the commander of the army post at Santiago Atitlán only days before two of the other plaintiffs in that suit (Jacinto and Adolfo) were themselves arrested on October 28, 1982. The sixth plaintiff later turned out to be one of the first of the fifteen suspects captured after news of Lencho's abduction raced through the town. Thus all six of Fernando's accusers eventually found themselves in jail, while Fernando was free to get himself elected mayor of San Pedro in the November 3, 1985, elections.
The appointment of secret agents apparently was part of an extensive change in army strategy initiated during the Lucas García regime to counter the threat of insurgency. Previously based only in the capital and a few other cities, the army extended into the countryside to establish a center of strength, a zonal command, in each of the republic's twenty-two departments. The zonal command in turn infiltrated local communities such as San Pedro to create an espionage network. It remains unclear how the work of secret agents such as Salvador, Jorge, and Mario, was coordinated with that of the military commissioners to compile blacklists and stage abductions during the period when Jacinto was chief military commissioner.
The two army-connected groups were composed in the main of different kinds of people. Inspection of the characteristics of the eighteen former commissioners named in the April 1983 newspaper article the eight prisoners who were awaiting trial and the ten others whose arrests were being soughtreveals that they tended to be rather impecunious, powerless, and undistinguished individuals. Most of them were laborers, fishermen, or petty traders. All were married with children; most were in their thirties. What they mainly sought was instant gratification. One informant, when asked why former commissioners had abused their offices, replied by making three digital gestures signifying money, liquor, and sex. Some of the men showed signs of corruptibility even before they became involved in extortion and violence. One commissioner, for instance, is said to have doctored the books when he was a municipal employee, paying workmen less than the amount he recorded and keeping the difference. In earlier days, when Jacinto was merely a recruiting agent, he would accept ten-dollar bribes not to recruit particular young Pedranos.
|In contrast to the former commissioners, the
secret agents were older men in their fifties and sixties, prominent in the community,
ambitious, and fairly well-off. Three of them owned productive coffee land. Two owned
commercial propertytrucks for hauling goods long distances or launches for
transporting passengers and cargo between San Pedro and the market town Santiago Atitlán.
Two of the secret agents, with histories of extended service in the armed forces, had
friends and connections in the military; one or two had political connections in high
The boat owner took advantage of his secret-agent status to negotiate profitable deals for himself. He accused a man in Tzununá, across the lake, of transporting guerrillas in a launch the man owned. The Pedrano flashed his army carnet (identification card) to frighten him. He then forced the man to sell the launch for a very low price, giving him only a small down payment and saying that he would pay the rest later. The Tzununa man lost more than one thousand dollars in the deal. He became despondent and reportedly drank himself to death. In a similar manner the unscrupulous boat owner is said to have acquired another launch for a low price from the administrator of a coffee plantation near San Pedro.
But what the secret agents mainly wanted, in contrast to the former commissioners, was political power. They sought to capture the two key posts, the mayor's office and that of chief military commissioner. For a while they were successful. Jorge was imposed as mayor and held onto his office for more than a year before the town persuaded the Sololá commander to remove him. Salvador, who had operated as a military commissioner overtly and as an intelligence officer covertly, was reputed to be the real leader of the commissioners, even while Jacinto, a less forceful person, was officially in charge. When Jacinto was taken prisoner, Salvador made an unsuccessful bid to be named chief commissioner.
Of the five secret agents, Mario, the güizache with an unsavory reputation, was undoubtedly the most noteworthy. According to our sources, it was he who had advised Marta that a four-hundred-dollar payment could ransom arrested Adolfo, and who later counseled the eight imprisoned former commissioners to apply for amnesty by claiming to be repentent Ixim guerrillas. He allegedly is the person who delivered seven hundred dollars to Lieutenant Rolando in payment for kidnapping Lencho, and he was one of the four men (all secret agents) whom Lencho's widow said she had seen leaving an alley while masked men were carrying off her husband.
It may seem strange that the army would punish operatives for deeds presumably committed in collaboration with army units, but it should be remembered that the army is a complex organization made up of separate suborganizations and subject to changing directives over time. One unit may punish people for actions ordered by a different, possibly clandestine, unit. The policy of a post commander may be reversed by the commander who succeeds him. But it is unlikely that the eight Pedranos sentenced by an army court were convicted of crimes committed jointly with army personnel. There was no need of that. Victimized Pedranos supplied enough evidence to convict the conspirators of crimes committed independentlyrape, extortion, murder. In addition, the army wrung confessions out of the arrested men by methods of its own. One informant told us what he had learned on this score from former commissioners whom he visited in prison. During the ten days they were held at the Santiago Atitlán post following their capture on October 28, 1982, they were beaten with clubs. They were also put in a pit with water in it. The prisoners said that they thought this treatment was going to kill them.
We do not know whether any of the kidnapped Pedranos were taken to the same place or subjected to similar treatment, but we do know that the pit treatment was applied to suspected subversives in 1983. In the fall of that year an interview with a soldier stationed outside the army barracks in Santiago Atitlán was recorded on tape and printed verbatim in Americas Watch Report (January 1984) entitled, "Guatemala: A Nation of Prisoners." The soldier was asked how long captured persons generally remained in the camp. He replied, "Here, about two months, and if they don't want to talk then they get put in the hole with water."
"And how do they feel there in the hole?"
"Well, of course, they're going to feel terrible. Once you put them in there, they can't take it, and they die."
"How many are in there now?"
"There are two in there. They've been in there for two days; we take them out to tell us what they do, and if they don't say anything, we stick them in again."
of Operation of a Death Squad in San Pedro la Laguna
[ Introduction ]
|LINKS TO SECTION PAGES
To contact us write: Arte Maya Tz'utuhil, P.O. Box 40391, San
Francisco, CA 94140. Telephone: (415) 282-7654.
Email me at